Arjun pandit rao khotkar vs kailash summary
Web15 lug 2024 · Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal And Ors. Petitioner(s): Arjun Panditrao Khotkar: Respondent(s): Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal … Web8 set 2024 · But Arjun Panditrao (supra) has held that mandatory certificate under Section 65B is a condition precedent and goes to the very root of admissibility of any Secondary …
Arjun pandit rao khotkar vs kailash summary
Did you know?
Web26 lug 2024 · Most importantly, such Digitally signed by ARJUN BISHT Date: 2024.07.26 a certificate must accompany the electronic record like computer printout, compact disc (CD), video 17:27:15 IST Reason: compact disc (VCD), pen drive, etc., pertaining to 1 which a statement is sought to be given in evidence, when the same is produced in evidence. WebArjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Ors. www.itatonline.org (SC) : MANU/SC/0521/2024. Indian Evidence Act, 1872 S. 65B – Evidence – Electronic records- Certificate under Section 65B(4) – Not necessary if original document is itself produced. [Information Technology Act, 2000, S.3 ]
While a concurring opinion in Arjun Panditrao (penned by V. Ramasubramanian, J.) looks at these global best practices and suggests a reconsideration of Section 65-B, we argue that the Court’s reasoning and conclusion would have been enriched by drawing on comparative lessons, especially from the United … Visualizza altro Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, 1872 (Act), dealing with the admissibility of electronic evidence, has emerged as one of the most controversial provisions under the Act over the … Visualizza altro Under the scheme of the Act, electronic evidence is primarily governed by Sections 65-A and 65-B. The purpose of Section 65-A is only to … Visualizza altro In Arjun Panditrao, based on the non obstante clause in sub-section (1) of Section 65-B, the Supreme Court proceeded to hold that Section 65-B operates … Visualizza altro As mentioned earlier, Section 65-B(4) allows a party to produce a certificate which avers to “any of the things” mentioned therein as proof of one or more of those things. … Visualizza altro Web14 lug 2024 · While Harry Parker was a civil proceeding, the principle laid down therein found acceptance in a criminal trial in R. vs. Burr and 10 [1940] 2 KB 590 95 Sullivan.11 …
Web22 lug 2024 · On 14 July 2024, a three judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered its judgment in Arjun Panditrao Khotkar, in what ought to have been an authoritative ruling … WebARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR …Appellant Versus KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL AND ORS. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2407 OF 2024 …
Web27 gen 2024 · Kailash to conclude that Whatsapp chats shall have no evidentiary value until a certificate is produced under Section 65B(4). While production of a certificate under Section 65B(4) may be a necessary safeguard to ensure authenticity, there is a need to formulate other safeguards as well – to ensure that privacy and confidentiality of the …
WebContributed by: P&A Law Offices On 14th July 2024, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) delivered its judgment in the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. … burnt sceneWebARJUN PANDIT RAO KHOTKAR. vs. KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL & Ors. [civil appl no. 20825-20826 of 2024] DATE OF THE VERDICT-July 14 th, 2024BENCH - R F … burnt scene where waitress is cryingWeb14 lug 2024 · 73. These appeals are dismissed with costs of INR One Lakh each to be paid by Shri Arjun Panditrao Khotkar (i.e. the Appellant in C.A. Nos. 20825-20826 of 2024) to both Shri Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Shri Vijay Chaudhary. V. Ramasubramanian, J. 74. While I am entirely in agreement with the opinion penned by R.F. Nariman, J. burnt school house cemetery baxter county arWeb22 feb 2024 · Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal & Ors., Civil Appeal Nos. 20825 – 20826 of 2024, 2407 of 2024 and 3696 of 2024, decided on July 14, 2024. … burnt scentWeb26 lug 2024 · Paramjit Singh Patwalia and Devadatt Kamat, Senior Advocates [Haribhau Damodar Zol, Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure (Advocate-on-Record), Pratik Arvind Bhosle, … burnt scotch martinWeb14 lug 2024 · Supreme Court: In a reference dealing with the interpretation of Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872 that deals with admissibility of electronic records, the 3-judge bench of RF Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ has held that the certificate required under Section 65B(4) is a condition precedent to the admissibility of evidence by … hammels wye rockawayhammel towing